॥ શ્રી સ્વામિનારાયણો વિજયતે ॥

ભગવાન સ્વામિનારાયણનાં

॥ વચનામૃત ॥

Panchala-2

Sānkhya and Yoga

On Fāgun sudi 7, Samvat 1877 [10 March 1821], Shriji Mahārāj was sitting on a large, decorated cot that had been placed on a platform in Jhinābhāi’s darbār in Panchālā. He was wearing a white khes and had covered Himself with a white blanket. He had also tied a white feto around His head. At that time, an assembly of paramhansas as well as an assembly of devotees from various places had gathered before Him.

Thereupon Shriji Mahārāj said, “Please bring the Moksh-dharma scripture so that we can arrange for a discourse on the chapter of Sānkhya and the chapter of Yoga.” Thereupon, the scripture was brought, and Nityānand Swāmi commenced the reading.

Shriji Mahārāj then said, “The followers of Yoga consider jiva and ishwar to be the 25th element and Paramātmā to be the 26th element. On the other hand, followers of Sānkhya include jiva and ishwar with the 24 elements, and consider Paramātmā to be the 25th element. Of the two, the followers of Yoga believe that regardless of however much one contemplates upon the ātmā and non-ātmā, or however much one endeavours, without accepting the refuge of the manifest form of God, one cannot attain liberation. On the other hand, followers of Sānkhya believe that if one understands the ultimate fate of all deities, humans, etc., and develops vairāgya for the vishays and realises one’s ātmā as transcending the three bodies, then one becomes a mukta. But since each of these two types of beliefs have their own deficiencies, one should employ certain methods of interpretation for the purpose of resolving those deficiencies.

“The drawback of the Yoga doctrine is that both the jiva and ishwar have been considered as the 25th element and both have been said to have bodies comprised of 24 elements. As a result, both the jiva and ishwar seem equal. This would suggest that the sthul body is the same as virāt, the sukshma body is the same as sutrātmā, and the kāran body is the same as avyākrut. It also suggests that the waking state is the same as that of sustenance, the dream state is the same as that of creation, and the deep sleep state is the same as that of dissolution. Moreover, vishwa, taijas and prāgna would be considered equal to Vishnu, Brahmā and Shiv respectively. Thus, those followers would worship the 26th element with such understanding. So, to remove this deficiency of equating jiva and ishwar, one should learn the following method of interpretation from a wise person: The five bhuts residing in the body of ishwar are known as mahābhuts, and those bhuts sustain the bodies of all jivas. On the other hand, the five bhuts in the body of the jiva are minor and are incapable of sustaining others. Also, the jiva possesses limited knowledge compared to ishwar, who is all-knowing. One should learn such a method of interpretation so that the jiva and ishwar are not understood to be equal to each other. If one has not done that and some adversary were to ask a question in a debate, then one would find it difficult to reply. As a result, one’s own understanding would become confused. But if one has learnt such a method, then even if someone were to raise a question, one would not allow the jiva and ishwar to be considered as being equal to each other. Therefore, one should learn such a method of interpretation so that the jiva and ishwar do not seem to be equal, and one should listen to words to that effect.

“Next, the drawback of the followers of the Sānkhya doctrine is that they consider Paramātmā to be the 25th element, transcending the 24 elements. They consider the 24 elements as being false and Paramātmā as being satya. If that were so, who would attain that Paramātmā? After all, the jiva, who is the attainer, is not considered distinct from the elements. Therefore, to remove that deficiency, one should learn the following method of interpretation from a wise person: jiva and ishwar have been included with the elements because those 24 elements cannot exist without the jiva and ishwar. But in reality jiva and ishwar are distinct from those elements and do attain Paramātmā. One should learn such a method of interpretation. If one has not done so, and an opponent in a debate were to ask a question, doubts would arise; i.e., one would think, ‘If the elements are truly false, then what is the purpose of prescribing the observance of dharma such as brahmacharya, etc., and spiritual endeavours such as shravan, manan, nididhyās, etc., to attain Paramātmā?’ Therefore, jiva and ishwar have been included with the elements because they have attained oneness with the elements, but in reality they are totally distinct from those elements and do attain Paramātmā. In this way, followers of Sānkhya should learn such methods of interpretation from a wise sādhu.

“Moreover, the followers of Yoga propound methods such as the following: Liberation is attained by meditating on the manifest form of the avatārs of God such as Matsya, Kachchha, Varāh, Nrusinh, Vāman, Rām, Krishna, etc. But the followers of Sānkhya accept methods which claim that liberation is attained when one fully realises the form of God, through experience, as described by the various Shruti scriptures - for example, as stated in: ‘Yato vācho nivartante aprāpya manasā saha’. Both doctrines are good and have been accepted by the great; one who follows both of them appropriately does attain the highest state. In both of these doctrines, the same spiritual endeavours have been prescribed, but the mode of worship in each is not the same; in fact, it is extremely different.”

Having spoken in this manner, Shriji Mahārāj then told the paramhansas, “Now please sing devotional songs.”

Thereupon Muktānand Swāmi and some other paramhansas commenced singing devotional songs to the accompaniment of musical instruments. Following this, Shriji Mahārāj said, “Now please stop the devotional songs. While you were singing, I thought over the principles of both Sānkhya and Yoga; please listen as I explain.

“For one who follows Yoga, the luminous, divine form of God which resides in Akshardhām at the time of ātyantik-pralay is worthy of being meditated on. Moreover, God in the form of Prakruti-Purush is also worthy of being meditating on, albeit to a lesser extent. To a lesser extent than that, God in the form of the 24 elements, which have evolved from Prakruti-Purush, is also worthy of being meditated on. To a lesser extent than that, Hiranyagarbh; and to a lesser extent than that, Virāt - who has evolved from the 24 elements - is also worthy of being meditated on. Still to a lesser extent than that, Brahmā, Vishnu, Mahesh, as well as the avatārs of God on this earth such as Matsya, Kurma, Nrusinh, Varāh, etc., as well as shaligrām and other murtis of God - are all worthy of being meditated on. This, I realised while thinking, is the essence of the doctrine of Yoga.

“Then, I thought over the Sānkhya doctrine. They have done away with all those forms, and it appears that they believe, ‘The cause of all thoughts is the jiva, and since there is nothing as pure as the jiva, it is appropriate to meditate on the jiva.’ In order to refute this view of Sānkhya, I again thought of Yoga. Specifically, Purushottam Bhagwān - who transcends everything - has an anvay relationship with Prakruti-Purush and all other entities. Therefore, they are all God; all possess a divine form; all are satya and worthy of being meditated on. Certain Vedic verses also support this fact : ‘Sarvam khalvidam brahma’, ‘Neha nānāsti kinchana’, and ‘Idam hi vishvam bhagavān-ivetaro yato jagat-sthāna-nirodha-sambhavāhā |’. Thus, an aspirant who follows that path of Yoga encounters no obstacles. Why? Because that path is easy and relies on the manifest form of God. Because of this, through that path even an ordinary person can attain liberation without any difficulty.

“However, there is one drawback on that path: Prakruti-Purush, etc., are thought of as being the components of the all-transcending Purushottam Bhagwān. That is, the following belief could develop: Prakruti-Purush are components of God, and their components are Hiranyagarbh, Virāt, etc. If such an understanding develops, then that is a major drawback since one feels God is divisible and has components; however, God is, in fact, indivisible, without components, unchanging, imperishable and whole. Therefore, such a misunderstanding should not be allowed to arise.

“Also, one should understand, ‘God is one and unparalleled, while others such as Prakruti-Purush, etc., are His devotees and meditate on Him.’ That is why they are referred to as forms of God. Just as a great sādhu who meditates on God is known as a form of God, in the same way Prakruti-Purush, etc., are also forms of God. Moreover, Purushottam Shri Krishna - who transcends everything - Himself assumes the forms of Vāsudev, Sankarshan, Pradyumna and Aniruddha, and assumes the avatārs of Rām, Krishna, etc. Thus, He is worthy of being meditated on.’ If one has such an understanding, then that path of Yoga is absolutely free of obstacles and is the best path.

“Now the drawback of the Sānkhya doctrine is that it claims, ‘All that is grasped via the antahkaran and the indriyas is false, while all that is grasped through experience is satya.’ Thereby, they propound all forms as being false. But along with that, they also consider the forms of God that have manifested to liberate the jivas as being false. In fact, they also view the forms of Aniruddha, Pradyumna and Sankarshan as being false. They only accept Vāsudev, who is nirgun. That is their major drawback.

“Therefore, it suits the followers of Sānkhya to believe, ‘After imbibing the thoughts of sānkhya and considering whatever has evolved from Prakruti-Purush as being perishable, one should realise one’s own ātmā as being distinct from all, as being pure and brahmarup. Then, understanding the form of God that has manifested to liberate the jivas as being satya, one should meditate on Him.’ In this manner, these two types of thoughts can be known if one learns from someone who is wise, like Me; otherwise, even if one studies or listens to the scriptures, one cannot understand them.

“In reality, the teachings of Yoga are actually for one who has become brahmarup by initially having practised thoughts of sānkhya. Thus, it is said:

Brahma-bhootaha prasannātmā na shochati na kānkshati |
Samaha sarveshu bhooteshu mad-bhaktim labhate parām ||
Ātmārāmāsh-cha munayo nirgranthā apyurukrame |
Kurvantyahaitukeem bhaktim-ittham-bhoota-guno harihi ||
Parinishthito’pi nairgunya uttama-shloka-leelayā |
Gruheeta-chetā rajarshe ākhyānam yad-adheetavān ||

“In this way, the Sānkhya doctrine is dependent on Yoga. Why? Because through that sānkhya thought, the followers of Sānkhya realise all vishays that can be indulged in via the five indriyas and four antahkarans - which are distinct from one’s own ātmā - to be totally vain. Therefore, such a person is not enticed by any objects, nor does he become attached to them. Moreover, if someone were to say to him, ‘This object is extremely pleasurable,’ he would think, ‘It may be pleasurable, but it is perceived through the indriyas and antahkaran; and that which the indriyas and antahkaran perceive is asatya and perishable.’ Such is the firm understanding of a follower of Sānkhya, who also realises his own ātmā as pure. Such a person should meditate on, worship, and offer bhakti to God according to the path of Yoga. If he does not adopt this, that would be a major flaw in him.

“In this manner, I have described the eternal principles of the Sānkhya scriptures and the Yoga scriptures having thoroughly pondered over them. The unorthodox proponents of Yoga and Sānkhya, however, have corrupted both paths. Those who are proponents of Yoga try to establish the truth of forms, and in the process they realise all people, the forms of Brahmā, Vishnu and Shiv, as well as the forms of Rām, Krishna and other avatārs as equal to each other. Followers of Sānkhya denounce all forms, and in the process they also denounce places of pilgrimage; observances; murtis; yam and niyam; forms of dharma such as brahmacharya; as well as Brahmā, Vishnu, Shiv; and Rām, Krishna and other avatārs. Therefore, both, the unorthodox followers of Sānkhya and the unorthodox followers of Yoga, have deviated from the correct path. As a result, they will be consigned to narak.”

Vachanamrut ॥ 2 ॥ 128 ॥

* * *

This Vachanamrut took place ago.


FOOTNOTES

1. यतो वाचो निवर्तन्ते अप्राप्य मनसा सह

From where speech returns along with the mind without having attained [Brahma, i.e, God]. - Taittiriya Upanishad: 2.4.1

2. सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म

Indeed, all this [i.e. the whole universe] is Brahma [i.e. the form of God]. - Chhāndogya Upanishad: 3.14.1

3. नेह नानास्ति किञ्चन

There is nothing in this universe that is not the form of Brahma [i.e. God]. - Bruhadāranyaka Upanishad: 6.4.19

4. इदं हि विश्वं भगवानिवेतरो यतो जगत्स्थाननिरोधसंभवाः ।

Indeed, this universe is as if another form of God - who is the cause of the creation, sustenance and dissolution of the world. - Shrimad Bhāgwat: 1.5.20

5. ब्रह्मभूतः प्रसन्नात्मा न शोचती न कांक्षति ।
समः सर्वेषु भूतेषु मद्‌भक्तिं लभते पराम् ॥

One who has become brahmarup remains joyful, grieves nothing, desires nothing, behaves equally with all beings, and attains my supreme bhakti. - Bhagwad Gitā: 18.54

6. आत्मारामाश्च मुनयो निर्ग्रन्था अप्युरुक्रमे ।
कुर्वन्त्यहैतुकिं भक्तिमित्थम्भूतगुणो हरिः ॥

Despite being engaged [only] in the ātmā [i.e. having attained ātmā-realisation] and despite having overcome all base natures - the munis [still] offer selfless bhakti to God [because] God possesses such [divine] qualities. - Shrimad Bhāgwat: 1.7.10

7. परिनिष्ठितोऽपि नैर्गुण्य उत्तम श्लोकलीलया ।
गृहीतचेता राजर्षे आख्यानं यदधीतवान् ॥

O King [Parikshit]! Despite being perfectly poised in the nirgun state, I [Shukdevji] - having been attracted by the divine actions and incidents of God studied the [Shrimad Bhāgwat] epic. - Shrimad Bhāgwat: 2.1.9

SELECTION
Prakaran Gadhada I (78) Sarangpur (18) Kariyani (12) Loya (18) Panchala (7) Gadhada II (67) Vartal (20) Amdavad (3) Gadhada III (39) Bhugol-Khagol Additional (11) Additional Info Vachanamrut Study People in the Vachanamrut Vachanamrut Introduction Vachanamrut Preface Pramukh Swami Maharaj’s Blessings Vachanamrut Calendar Paratharo 4: Auspicious Marks Paratharo 5: Daily Routine Appendices

Type: Keywords Exact phrase